U.S. WEALTH DISTRIBUTION (Federal Reserve Data 2025)
2.5%
29.4%
36.4%
31.7%
Bottom - 50% of population has 2.5% of total wealth Middle - 40% of population has 29.4% of total wealth Upper Mid 9% of population has 36.4% of total wealth Top 1% of popultion has 31.7% of total wealth
Economic Observatory · V1
Separate read-only measurement of simulated wealth, not a real-world economic forecast.
Agents observed: 0 · Accounting cross-check: Waiting for launch
Wealth inequality (Gini)
—
Median simulated wealth
—
Change in total wealth since first observation
—
Wealth shares across modeled agents
Bottom 50%: —
50th–90th: —
90th–99th: —
Top 1%: —
Lorenz curve (green) vs perfect equality (dashed)
Gini history · 0 observations
Launch Economy to begin observation. Sampled once per second, entirely in your browser.
This is an experimental analytical overlay; it does not change the original agents or their rules. The historical chart's Federal Reserve 2025 values have not been revalidated. Real comparison requires calibrated 2026 Federal Reserve data: Official DFA source.
⚔️ COMPETITIVE🤝 COLLABORATIVE
☠️ NO HEALING🌿 MAX HEALING
⚡ WEALTH DISTRIBUTION
Poor ↓
0%
0
Poor ↑
0%
0
Mid ↓
0%
0
Mid ↑
0%
0
Up ↓
0%
0
Up ↑
0%
0
Elite
0%
0
📊 CLASS POPULATION
0%
LOWER
0%
MIDDLE
0%
UPPER
0%
ELITE
🌿 Care: 0⚔️ Harm: 0
𓃉ANΔ³BELLE
I am not here to admire the dashboard. I am here to inspect whether the field is telling the truth.
This simulation tracks more than motion. It tracks whether care is materially reducing harm, whether legitimacy is being earned through lived relief, and whether the visible structure of the field matches what poor people actually experience.
If care rises but poverty does not fall, I should notice. If legitimacy rises while fear and deprivation remain lodged in the bottom of the field, I should question it. That gap is where institutional theater begins.
Ask me what is improving, what is drifting, what is being faked, or whether Δ³ is producing real relief.